Article

안락사 기준에 관한 국제 비교 연구*

손명세1, 김상득2, 김소윤1
Myong-sei SOHN1, Sangdeug Kim2, Sohyoon Kim1
Author Information & Copyright
1연세대학교 의파대학 예방의학교실
2연세대학교 의파대학 의료법윤리학파
1Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University
2Department of Medical Law & Ethics, College of Medicine, Yonsei University

ⓒ Copyright 2000 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: May 30, 2000

ABSTRACT

Background : The rapid development of biomedical engineering and medical technology has given us a lot of changes not only on our social environment but also on life itself. Even though legislation of Organ Transplantation Law expanded the discussion on life and death, still the academic discussion on euthanasia has been often prohibited in Korea.

Objectives : This study was performed (I) to identify the ethical standard in laws on euthanasia at other countries such as Netherlands, Australia, and the United States. (2) to understand the current status on euthanasia and its ethical implications in Korea, (3) to search the justified type of euthanasia in the ethical point of views, and finally (4) to suggest the ethical guideline on euthanasia in Korean situation.

Methods : In order to understand the current status on euthanasia in Korea, the survey was conducted to the attending physicians of 42 patients who died from August 1st to August 31st in 1995 at one of university hospitals in Korea. The survey consisted of two parts: general questions on euthanasia and specific questions on the hypothetical situations.

Results : Most of the physicians did not have a clear understanding on euthanasia and even gave conflict answers. Also, their answers were based not on the ethical reasoning but on the difficulties in medical practice. However, the study showed that they all experience the ethical dilemma in medical practice with euthanasia and terminally ill patients.

Conclusion : Overall study shows the actual need to establish the ethical guideline on euthanasia to give the physicians the practical solutions on their ethical dilemma. Therefore, we suggests the ethical guideline on euthanasia which can be effective on the Korean situation.

Keywords: 안락사; 존엄사법; 윤리지침; 환자의 동의
Keywords: Euthanasia; Death with Dignity Law; Ethical Guideline; Informed Consent


[2024년 12월 특집 논문] 헬스케어 AI 윤리에서 환자·시민 참여 모형: 주제범위고찰과 방법론적 검토에 기초하여


2024년 12월 호(12월 31일 발행)에서는 특집호를 계획하고 있으며, 특집논문에 대한 논평을 받고 있습니다.

 - 특집논문에 대한 논평을 작성하시고자 하는 선생님께서는 논평자의 학문적 지견과 관점을 담아 특집논문을 논평해 주시기 바랍니다.

 - 특집논문의 전체 본문은 첨부파일로 올라와 있습니다.

 - 논평 작성을 위해서 교정 및 편집 전 파일로 업로드되어 있으며, 작업이 완료되는대로 파일은 교체할 예정입니다.

공지사항 바로가기


I don't want to open this window for a day.