Article

생명과학 전공 대학원생을 위한 「연구윤리」강의사례 보고*

강은희1, 이상욱2, 조은희3,*
Eun-Hui KANG1, Sang-Wook YI2, Eun-Hee CHO3,*
Author Information & Copyright
1조선대학교 교육대학원
2한양대학교 철학과
3조선대학교 사범대학 생물교육과
1Graduate School of Education, Chosun University
2Department of Philosophy, Hanyang Univeristy
3Department of Biology Education, Chosun University
*교신저자 : 조은희. 조선대학교 사범대학 생물교육과. 062-230-7370. ehcho@chosun.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2006 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Dec 31, 2006

ABSTRACT

A research ethics course for students majoring in biology was developed and offered as an optional course for graduate students in the Department of Biology at Chonnam National University in the fall semester of 2005. The course was intended to serve as a pilot program for a larger research project to develop a research ethics course for students in the biomedical sciences. Among eleven students enrolled in the course, six were in the Master’s program and five were pursuing their doctoral degrees. Topics covered in the course included the following: being a biologist, career development, what to do in a graduate school, the lab community, mentor-mentee relationship, record keeping, data mining, scientific writing, authorship, scientific misconduct, conflicts of interests, research involving animals, human subjects, and the ethics of stem-cell research. For each topic, a general introduction was followed by problem-based discussions among students. All reading materials and cases to be discussed were posted on a web site prior to class. Students were required to read the material and express their opinions at an on-line forum before coming to each class. In the classroom, a pre-designated student would introduce and analyze the cases in order to facilitate discussion. Students actively participated in both the on-line and off-line discussions, especially when the topics were related to their first-hand experiences. The evaluation of the answers to the pre- and the post-course questionnaires showed that the students’ perception of research ethics had changed in such a way that they paid greater attention to the issues of integrity in scientific research. While students were aware of the dominant ethical issues concerning research in biomedical science, before completing the course they were relatively unaware that ethical issues are raised by such things as mentor-mentee relationships and authorship criteria. The problem-based discussion process and the supplementary web-material were regarded positively by the students. In conclusion, as long as enough teaching materials and discussion cases are made available to teachers, a case-based discussion course with on-line supplements can help graduate students increase their ethical sensitivity toward issues of scientific integrity.

Keywords: 연구윤리; 윤리교육; 생명윤리; 전문가 교육; 연구부정행위; 이해상충
Keywords: Scientific integrity; Research ethics education; Case-based discussion; On-line supplements; Scientific misconduct


[2024년 12월 특집 논문] 헬스케어 AI 윤리에서 환자·시민 참여 모형: 주제범위고찰과 방법론적 검토에 기초하여


2024년 12월 호(12월 31일 발행)에서는 특집호를 계획하고 있으며, 특집논문에 대한 논평을 받고 있습니다.

 - 특집논문에 대한 논평을 작성하시고자 하는 선생님께서는 논평자의 학문적 지견과 관점을 담아 특집논문을 논평해 주시기 바랍니다.

 - 특집논문의 전체 본문은 첨부파일로 올라와 있습니다.

 - 논평 작성을 위해서 교정 및 편집 전 파일로 업로드되어 있으며, 작업이 완료되는대로 파일은 교체할 예정입니다.

공지사항 바로가기


I don't want to open this window for a day.