PDF Download
PubReader
Export Citation
Email the Author
Share Facebook
Share Twitter
Cited by 8 Articles
Metrics (View:1,185)- Attitudes and Practices of Critical Care Physicians in End-of-life Decisions in Korean Intensive Care Units
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
A Critical Care Physician’s Perspective on the Care Process and Death of a Terminal Cancer Patient
Korean J Med Ethics 2025;28(1):9-13.
The Attitude of Doctors towards End-of-Life Care Decision-Makings in Korea: Focused on Palliative Sedation*,**
Korean J Med Ethics 2016;19(1):60-73.
The Influence of New Legislation on the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment on the Perceptions and Experiences of Residents in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea
Korean J Med Ethics 2020;23(4):279-299.
연명치료중단과 유보 결정에 대한 한국 중환자 전담의사 인식과 실행
Published Online: Mar 31, 2009
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate both the attitudes and practices of critical care physicians in Korean ICUs regarding end-of-life care decisions as well as the factors that influence those attitudes and practices.
Methods: A questionnaire was developed and delivered to 100 members of the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine in September 2007. The questionnaire was divided into six parts including personal information, decision-making processes, the withdrawing and withholding of life-sustaining treatment, informed consent, consultation with ethics committees, and guidelines.
Results: Eighty eight responses from 53 different institutions were received. The results of the questionnaire include the following. There was a significant difference between the attitude and practices of respondents concerning family consent and patient’s consent. Attitudes toward patient and family consent differed significantly according to the clinical experiences of the respondents (p<.05). There was a significant difference between the attitudes and practices of respondents concerning how often caregivers effectively communicated with patients and family members. Attitudes toward family participation in decision-making processes differed significantly according to the respondents’ gender. There was also a significance difference between the attitudes and practices of respondents regarding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Attitudes and practices on this issue varied according to the type of ICU where the respondents worked and their medical specialty. Practices concerning informed consent for “do not resuscitate” orders varied significantly according to respondent’s age and type of ICU. Finally, attitudes on the participation of ethics committees in decision-making processes varied significantly according to respondent’s clinical experiences (p<.05).
Conclusions: This study found significant differences in the attitudes and practices of critical care physicians in Korean ICUs concerning end-of-life care decisions and the withdrawing and withholding of life-sustaining treatment. The study also found that the factors influencing these attitudes and practices include age, specialty, clinical experiences, and the types of ICU in which physicians work. However, there are some limitations in generalizing these findings.