Article

의료전문가주의에 대한 법적 접근

류화신 1 , *
Hwa-Shin RYOO 1 , *
Author Information & Copyright
1충북대학교 법과대학
1College of law, Chungbuk National University
*충북대학교 법과대학. 043-261-3589. lawdeo@cbnu.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2007 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Dec 31, 2007

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the conception of medical professionalism reflected in the Korean Medical Act. Several articles of the Korean Medical Act dictate that physicians should adhere to improved medical techniques or higher ethical standards in their field. The authority of professionals is grounded in their knowledge and expertise; indeed it is the nature of their authority that makes their professionalism necessary. The values of professionalism(expertise, morality, self-regulation, patient welfare) have traditionally been different from the values of commerce. In this article I argue that medical professionalism will be challenged if physicians must prove their innocence in medical malpractice litigation, as a current legislative bill stipulates. This article also reviews the problems associated with the burden of proof in such cases.

Keywords: 전문가주의; 의료전문가주의; 무과실증명책임; 의사의 도덕성
Keywords: Professionalism; Medical professionalism; No-fault proof; Morality of physicians


[2025년 3월 임상사례] 실제 말기암 환자의 진료 과정을 통해 살펴본 한국의 사전돌봄계획 현황


2025년 3월 호(3월 31일 발행)에서는 특집호를 계획하고 있으며, 임상사례(Report)에 대한 논평을 받고 있습니다.

 - 임상사례에 대한 논평을 작성하시고자 하는 선생님께서는 논평자의 학문적 지견과 관점을 담아 특집논문을 논평해 주시기 바랍니다.

 - 임상사례의 전체 본문은 공지사항 첨부파일 PDF로 올라와 있습니다.

 

공지사항 바로가기


I don't want to open this window for a day.