Article

Hospital Ethics Committees in Korea

고윤석1,*, 맹광호2, 구영모3, 손명세4, 황상익3, 홍창기5
Younsuck KOH1,*, Kwang-ho MENG2, Young-Mo KOO3, Myong-sei SOHN4, Sang-Ik HWANG3, Changgi D HONG5
Author Information & Copyright
1울산대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
2가톨릭대학교의과대分 예방의학교실
3서울대학교의과대학 의사학교실
4연세대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실
5울산대 학교 의과대 학 내과학교실
1Department of Internal Medicine. Asan Medical Center. College of Medicine. University of Ulsan
2Department of Preventive Medicine. College of Medicine. Catholic University of Korea
3Department of the History of Medicine and Medical Humanities. Seoul National University College of Medicine
4Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. College of Medicine. Yonsei University
5Department of Internal Medicine. Asan Medical Center. College of Medicine. University of Ulsan
*Corresponding Author (email: yskoh@www.amc.seoul.kr)

ⓒ Copyright 1999 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Nov 25, 1999

ABSTRACT

Objectives : To identify the present status of the Hospital Ethics Committees (HECs) activities in Korea.

Design, setting, participants : A postal survey was sent to 76 major residents training hospitals. Additionally, we included the data related to HEC obtained from our another survey to identify residents' personal perception of medical ethics.

Main measurements and results : HECs were present at 48 of the 58 responding hospitals. Theologians, social workers, and lawyers are rarely involved with HECs. Only five HECs have held a meeting more than once per month. The main barriers to having an active, consistent HEC were time shortages of the members, and inadequate knowledge of medical laws or medical ethics. The thirteen respondents believed their HEC’s recommendations had a major influence on clinical practices. Two-third (66.6%) of responding residents did not know the existence of HEC in their hospitals. The most common reasons to develop a new HEC was to lighten a physician s burden in terms of ethics and law.

Conclusion : The HECs activities were poor. To address the growing number of ethical dilemmas or medical disputes at the hospitals, systematic assistance to promote the activity of HECs seems to be urgently required in our society.

Keywords: Hospital Ethics Committee; Korea; Medical Ethics
Keywords: 병원윤리위원회; 한국; 의료윤리


[2024년 12월 특집 논문] 헬스케어 AI 윤리에서 환자·시민 참여 모형: 주제범위고찰과 방법론적 검토에 기초하여


2024년 12월 호(12월 31일 발행)에서는 특집호를 계획하고 있으며, 특집논문에 대한 논평을 받고 있습니다.

 - 특집논문에 대한 논평을 작성하시고자 하는 선생님께서는 논평자의 학문적 지견과 관점을 담아 특집논문을 논평해 주시기 바랍니다.

 - 특집논문의 전체 본문은 첨부파일로 올라와 있습니다.

 - 논평 작성을 위해서 교정 및 편집 전 파일로 업로드되어 있으며, 작업이 완료되는대로 파일은 교체할 예정입니다.

공지사항 바로가기


I don't want to open this window for a day.