Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
The Korean Society for Medical Ethics
Article

의사의 프로페셔널리즘과 진료자율권

정유석1
Yoo-Seock CHEONG1
1단국대학교 의과대학 의료윤리학교실
1Department of Medical Ethics, Dankook University Medical School

ⓒ Copyright 2004 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Dec 31, 2004

ABSTRACT

Physicians' dual roles -healer and professional - are linked by codes of ethics governing behaviour and are empowered by science. Being part of a profession entails a societal contract. The profession is granted a monopoly over the use of a body of knowledge and the privilege of self-regulation and, in return, guarantees society professional competence, integrity and the provision of altruistic service. Societal attitudes to professionalism have changed from supportive to increasingly critical-with physicians being criticised for pursuing their own financial interests, and failing to self-regulate in a way that guarantees competence. Physician's professional autonomy in Korea has been threatened by several factors. The most important are the unreasonable national healthcare system and negligence of education of the professionalism in medical schools. It asserted that physicians exploited their monopoly to create a demand for services which they then satisfied. It identified serious failures in self-regulation, and abuse of collegiality to protect incompetent or unethical physicians. It criticised physicians for pursuing their own financial interests at the expense of both individual patients and society. For the ideal of professionalism to survive, physicians must understand it and its role in the social contract. They must meet the obligations necessary to sustain professionalism and ensure that healthcare systems support, rather than subvert, behaviour that is compatible with professionalism's values. In this, they acquire responsibility for its integrity, for its proper application, and for its expansion, which, for medicine, means the support of science. Professions have an obligation to transmit their knowledge by teaching it to future practitioners, the general public, and their patients. Even if the medical profession itself carries out ethical value education, it is unlikely that the values cherished by physicians for centuries can be preserved unless their preservation is encouraged and supported by society through the structure of the healthcare system. Healthcare systems can actively promote desirable behaviour or they can encourage physicians to place their own interest first. Without question, the medical profession itself wishes to function within a system dominated by a healthy and flourishing professionalism. Both government and publics should wish for the same type of physician- competent, moral, idealistic, and altruistic. This is best guaranteed by a reasonable health care system.

Keywords: 프로페셔널리즘; 진료자율권; 의료제도
Keywords: Professionalism; Clinical autonomy; Health care system