Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
The Korean Society for Medical Ethics
Article

뉘른베르그1) 강령과 인체실험의 윤리

김옥주1
Ock-Joo KIM1
1고려대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실
1Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Korea University

ⓒ Copyright 2002 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jun 30, 2002

ABSTRACT

Nowadays human subject researches encompass various kinds of biomedical researches: clinical trials, population studies, epidemiological studies, genetic studies, reproductive studies, stored sample studies, etc. While each category has its own specific ethical issues and corresponding guidelines, universal guidelines of human subject research have been developed at the international level. The Nuremberg Code adopted in 1947 marked a major turning point in the history of research ethics. Although risks related to human subject research has been known since ancient time, the Nuremberg Code initiated international efforts to protect human rights in biomedical researches. For 2500 years, the Hippocratic Oath has stressed the physicians integrity and loyalty to the patient. The Nuremberg Code shifted the main point of medical ethics from physicians attitude to the voluntary informed consent of research participants. As reflected in the Code, the traditional doctor-patient relationship (the healer-patient relation) extended to include the researcher-subject relation in modern times.

The Nuremberg Code came out from the painful chapters of the history of human experimentation during the World War II. At the Nuremberg Trial in 1946-47, twenty three Nazi scientists and doctors were prosecuted for their inhuman human experimentation. While the trial revealed Nazi physicians' cruelty, the judges tried to establish international consensus concerning what is an acceptable experiment on human being throughout the trial. Fifteen defendants were sentenced as guilty of crime against humanity and war crime. The Nuremberg Code was proclaimed as a part of final verdict of the trial.

In this paper I examine in what historical context the Code was shaped; what are lessons of the Nuremberg Trials; and what is the legacy of the Code. Although the Code initiated the international efforts to establish ethic of human subject research, the Nuremberg Code and following Declaration of Helsinki has never guaranteed protection of the human subjects of biomedical researches.

Keywords: 뉘른베르그 강령; 인체실험; 연구윤리; 역사
Keywords: Nuremberg code; human experiment; research ethics