Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
The Korean Society for Medical Ethics
Article

네덜란드에서의 안락사 담론: 의료적 안락사 판결 사례와 통계자료조사를 중심으로

김문정1,*
Moon-Jeong KIM1,*
1동아대학교 윤리문화학과
1Department of Ethics, Dong-A University
*동아대학교 윤리문화학과. louausms@hanmail.net

ⓒ Copyright 2007 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Dec 31, 2007

ABSTRACT

This article describes the origins and rationale of the Dutch policy on euthanasia. Euthanasia is in principle illegal in the Netherlands, as it is in other countries. However, under certain conditions euthanasia is “tolerated” in the Netherlands. The Dutch ethicist Bert Gordijn attributes this to the typical Dutch mentality to avoid radical positions and instead compromise in disputes. According to Gordijn, two dominant and somewhat contrary social forces from the 17th century influenced the Dutch mentality and policy: conservative Calvinism and free trade. Disputes emerging from conflicting interests were traditionally resolved according to the policy of tolerance, and certain illegal acts remained unpunished. The Dutch policy concerning euthanasia, a typical example of pragmatic tolerance, attempts to prevent the greater evil of unregulated euthanasia by tolerating the lesser evil of euthanasia under strict preconditions. Ongoing public discussion in the Netherlands about the legitimacy of more liberal euthanasia laws have given rise to the current Dutch policy on euthanasia and medically assisted suicide.

Keywords: 안락사 담론; 관용; 네덜란드인의 성향; 자기결정; 범국가적인 통계조사
Keywords: Debate on euthanasia; Tolerance; Dutch mentality; Self-determination